Dear Charles
Please find attached a letter of thanks for the grant received from Ealing in the Summer to help develop our Outside Area.
Our Playgroup is still full with a growing Waiting List, and we are working with Copley Close Charity EASE to target families in need to offer free places for under 3s. We are doing everything we can to address the Every Child Matters agenda, including reaching out to those most in need and applying for funding wherever possible to support us financially.
We have built our Reserves back up to legal levels in case of the Playgroup closing - at least we could now pay redundancy pay to our staff and pay off our liabilities (as required by the Charity Commission). But to say we are still struggling is an understatement.
This is not because of financial mismanagement, or mis-appropriation of funds - you are free to study our accounts at any time. It is simply because the actual cost of providing childcare at our setting is approximately £10 per session, and we are receiving £8.50 from Ealing per funded 3 year old.
Recently, our Deputy Manager handed me her NVQ Level 3 certificate - we are doing as asked and getting our staff trained up to Level NVQ 2 and NVQ 3 - but this costs our Playgroup money. Apparently the next expectation will be that the whole workforce has Level 2 and 3 qualifications - who exactly is meant to be paying for this? I agree wholeheartedly as a trained teacher myself that a well-trained workforce equals better outcomes for children, but it HAS to be funded properly.
We are looking at losing a substantial amount of money again this year - possibly as much as £7000. If Ealing cannot award us a Sustainability Grant this year I do not think we will be able to continue. We are awaiting the Cost Analysis information from you so that we can explain the situation we are in in more financial detail. In the meantime, I am waiting to speak to Lucy Smith, Assistant Director at the Early Years Policy Team of the DCSF in the hope that someone somewhere can give us some light at the end of the tunnel.
What makes me most exasperated is that the default position in our area is that middle class (mainly white) families access pre-school education without us making any effort. If we make a little effort, the ethnic mix increases but the social mix stays the same, it tends to be middle class famililes still that will seek us out. By making the kind of effort that Every Child Matters requires, we start getting families involved that really NEED pre-schools. This benefits everyone - the Nursery schools those children go onto, the schools, the whole of society - because problems that arise are tackled early and any Special Needs can be addressed early. We all know from personal experience that this early input makes a big difference - especially to those who most need it.
Hanwell Bunnies exists for the children - not for the parents, or for the Government, or for the Council, or for employers, but for the children. We passionately believe that 2 and 3 year olds benefit from 2 or 3 hours away from their primary carer a few times a week, and we know parents agree with us because our group is so popular. But we do not operate with the financial cushion that schools (or councils) have. We operate in effect as a business that is not allowed to make a surplus, and that makes us very vulnerable financially.
If there is an answer to our situation, I would love to hear what it is. If the answer is that we should stop our self-funded free places for vulnerable families, or charge parents of 2 year olds more to subsidise 'free' 3 year olds then there is something inherantly wrong with the whole system, and it is for this reason that I bring this problem to your attention yet again.
Thank you for listening
Kind regards
Liz Russell